The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The given bar graphs compare the detailed survey report on men and women proportion (in thousand) choosing higher education as a full time or part-time course in Britain over three different time periods.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that women witnessed a continuous upward trend in both types of education, while for men a marginal decline in full time and a slight uptick in part-time trends can be observed. Although part-time courses observed a significant rise, full-time education maintained its popularity among both the genders.
According to the given illustration, about 1 million men were enrolled for full-time courses in 1970/71, the trend fell down by 200k after 1 decade. However, a slight rise in the number moved the bar higher to 850k. In contrast, nearly 3/4th women got admitted to full-time streams in the starting session. Thereafter, the full-time demand kept on rising in each decade and jumped dramatically to a peak value of 1100k by the end of the last session.
On the other hand, Part-time courses also started earning a lime-light among both men and women. At the start, nearly 100k males pursued part-time courses, as against only 1/10th females. With the passing time, women rose 10 times, while men rose marginally by 50k. In the last session, both the genders acquired a similar trend by reaching 200k.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years 74
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 84
- The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...y report on men and women proportion in thousand choosing higher education as a full tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...thousand choosing higher education as a full time or part-time course in Britain over thr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...on, while for men a marginal decline in full time and a slight uptick in part-time trends...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed a similar trend by reaching 200k.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15111111111 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65736897636 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.756418277 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372851194207 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143789611565 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932561933595 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253900877714 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719949864316 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.