The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that never has our ecosystem been as fragile and as precious as it is today, and how to best address those critical issues is an ongoing debate. There are many ways to reduce environmental degradation, one of which is the higher cost of fuel. However, I personally disagree with this idea for a number of reasons, which will be outlined in this essay.
On the one hand, the idea that increases fuel price can solve the world’s environmental issues have a number of benefits if it works. Most fuel is non-renewable energy, the reliance on fossil fuel was the main cause of ecological crisis such as the greenhouse effect, air pollution, ozone layer depletion,… If the cost of fuel rises, the industrial operation reduces the dependence on fossil fuel, so there will be a huge positive impact on the environment. Much renewable energy can be given preference to save money. Therefore, environmental problems are supposed to be alleviated.
On the other hand, we can not assure that when we increase the price of fuel, companies will use the alternative sources of energy to manufacture or they simultaneously increase the cost of the output which will affect the customers, especially the poor and the vulnerable. As a result, a higher cost of fuel must not be the main measure of saving the ecosystem. It can be seen that many other solutions can also contribute to progress. Take for example, everyone can assist in the effort to alleviate environmental problems in the local community through simple actions such as recycling waste or planting a tree in their garden.
In conclusion, although increasing the cost of fuel can lead to numerous beneficial advantages, reducing the reliance on fuel alone is not the key to solve the problems. In my opinion, there is no best way to do this as different measures need to be taken at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | thao.nt211 | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-19 | thaopham1705 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ct, air pollution, ozone layer depletion,… If the cost of fuel rises, the industri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85579937304 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87866138423 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1440030143 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312535633822 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104307632447 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072761612261 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187716999442 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493949989754 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.