Some studies suggest that children spend more time watching TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things. Why do you think this is happening? What measures and methods can be used to solve the issue
According to one research compare to earlier days children are spending numerous amount of time on seeing television than being active and creative. Parents themselves are the cause of a child’s behaviour. However, it can be controlled by the intervene of family. I will elaborate the point further.
It is often seen, unlike before these days, parents are extremely busy in their work they tend to engross a child in front of the TV by themselves. This is because it becomes easier to keep an eye on them if they are in one place. Furthermore, it is lifesavers for them to complete their roles and responsibilities. For example, according to a survey conducted by The Child Welfare, on average 89% of mothers use the technique so that job is finished on time and without efforts. Therefore, initially, they make them habitually and letter regret.
Nevertheless, to alleviate the issue the key is the usage of parental control on TV this will help a child to be disciplined and also controls the watch on it. Secondly, they should encourage them to play more games like a scavenger hunt or engage in extra curriculum activities like craft or drawing this proliferating the adolescents' mind. Moreover, also help them to be fit mentally and physically and reduces the time spend in front of a television set. For instance, a recent article cited on the Times of India, says 75% of the children spend time on practical skills are profoundly have creative mind compare to a child who watches more of the idiot box.
To conclude, due to their hectic schedule parents forget TV has an adverse effect on a child. However, to mitigate this, control them is needed and occupying the kid towards practical activities should be encouraged more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-17 | simrankaursidhu | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-22 | Anupama Barooah | 61 | view |
- Some people say that cooking food at home is a waste of time They claim that good restaurants are better and can make modern living easier and less stressful Do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is a negative one Discuss both views and include your own opinion 78
- In some countries the elderly are highly valued and respected while in others youth is more highly valued Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 88
- Some people believe that it is best to do the same type of work throughout your life Others feel that it is beneficial to change jobs often Discuss both views and give your opinion 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...viour. However, it can be controlled by the intervene of family. I will elaborate the point f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 590, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...time on practical skills are profoundly have creative mind compare to a child who wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90878378378 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81570965707 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.35702134 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213041236656 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633120593215 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500751686472 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127528313393 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531579043822 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...viour. However, it can be controlled by the intervene of family. I will elaborate the point f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 590, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...time on practical skills are profoundly have creative mind compare to a child who wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90878378378 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81570965707 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.35702134 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213041236656 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633120593215 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500751686472 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127528313393 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531579043822 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.