Some people believe that government should not spend too much money on the outer space exploration do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, researchers have invested many research projects however some individuals afford that government should not spent much budget on space researchs. I am agree with this given motion that it totally wasteage of money to spent on space invention. I will discuss the features points in the later paragraphs
First and foramost, instead of waste of money on space project government should use that money for developing new road and well developed hospitals.secondly, government we up good factories and industrial for labour workers which lead to incline in employment in the country.lastly if government spent money on outer exploration unfortunately it fail then all revenues is waste less
Moving further, government should not spent money on moon project for example when Kalpana Chawla research on moon was unsuccessful because the rocket get destroyed moreover researchers do not get any information about the mission which lead to waste of money so government should provide best features to poor people who is in poverty line
On the other hand outer space is beneficial for nation builders to know about weather conditions with help of satellites set up in the sky and also about any deadly earthquake
In conclusion, government should spent money on outer space researchers to know about various researchers but it also focus on the daily needed thing of the citizens
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-14 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
2020-06-28 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 49 | view |
2015-01-09 | Luchayaar | 93 | view |
- Some people say that self employment is better than a job in a company or a institution 56
- Considering the problems of pollution and traffic jams some people at Gue cars should be banned from the centre of the city discuss advantages and disadvantages of it and actions taken to solve the problems 67
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 89
- The diagram below show time spent watching tv by age and gender in the uk in 1995 and 1999 81
- The graphs shows the Cost for watching movies and change in market share of three different ways of watching movies 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...duals afford that government should not spent much budget on space researchs. I am ag...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...nt much budget on space researchs. I am agree with this given motion that it totally ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... features points in the later paragraphs First and foramost, instead of waste of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fails'?
Suggestion: fails
...y on outer exploration unfortunately it fail then all revenues is waste less Moving...
^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... Moving further, government should not spent money on moon project for example when ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to poor people who is in poverty line On the other hand outer space is benefic...
^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sky and also about any deadly earthquake In conclusion, government should spent m...
^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'focuses', 'focusses'?
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...w about various researchers but it also focus on the daily needed thing of the citize...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27601809955 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94004154922 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 16.0721442886 19% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 73.0 20.2975951904 360% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 475.079642446 49.4020404114 962% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 388.666666667 106.682146367 364% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 73.6666666667 20.7667163134 355% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 42.6666666667 7.06120827912 604% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285262125606 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174659207219 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470448502833 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150996813629 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506384378885 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 40.3 13.0946893788 308% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -2.62 50.2224549098 -5% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.8 11.3001002004 281% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.53 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 31.2 10.1190380762 308% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.