Some people believe that the government should not spend too much money on the outer space exploration. Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary era, scientist always tend to seek new information regarding outer space. Majority of people condemn that immense revenue should not be invested on spece exploration by high authority. I agree with this notion and discuss agreement view in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, numerous reason are associated with this phenomenon. The prominent and predominant is that cost of such projects is in trillions, which is higher than GDP of many developing countries in the world. To explain this, space exploration project never ensure that it will be successful or not, which resulting to money wastage. In order to this, money expenditure should be spend on reducing unemployment and maintaining public buildings. For instance, Chandrayan 1 and 2 was not successful due to this, it leads to huge amount of money wastage. Henceforth, governments must limit their spending on outer space exploration.
Probe ahead, another reason that why government should not spend money on outer space that is leads to the problem of rellntion. To clarify this, a single rocket for outer space research a high amount of fouil fuel owing to this either femes it damage to environment or extent to fosill fuels in upcoming years. Moreover, most of researchers loss their life is the project not succeeded. To vindicate, one of the most infamous accident of space shuttle Columbia, in which NASA burnt a higher authority of fuel and many people were died during this problem. As a result, it is not fruitful to invest money on it.
To conclude, it is clearly seen from the above mention aspects that not only outer space exploration is waste of money but also hazardous. So, administration ought to avoid it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 49 | view |
| 2015-01-09 | Luchayaar | 93 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driver ss The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think news has no connection to People s lives so then it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers do you think advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers do you think advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The two pie chart give data about health rates from infection diseases in Canada between 1900 and 1930 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...er to this, money expenditure should be spend on reducing unemployment and maintainin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'damages'?
Suggestion: damages
...ouil fuel owing to this either femes it damage to environment or extent to fosill fue...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es it damage to environment or extent to fosill fuels in upcoming years. Moreover...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the researchers') or simply say ''most researchers''.
Suggestion: most of the researchers; most researchers
...sill fuels in upcoming years. Moreover, most of researchers loss their life is the project not succ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09540636042 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8223019869 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0814454057 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253670180692 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810006298688 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729152428765 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153243433366 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154376326433 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.