Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Gridlock on our roads has become the order of the day as everywhere is littered with all manner of vehicles with consequential environmental pollution. Increase in price of petrol has been argued to be the best way to abate the growing traffic and environmental problems, which i am not in support.
Increasing the price of petrol will undoubtedly reduce the number of cars on the street, because many people will not able to buy at high price. In spite of this, people will soon adapt and can afford buying at such price which will defeat the initial purpose of increasing fuel pump price, and pollution issues will continue as it were. For example, Nigeria government increased pump price of premium motor spirit last year and, there was reduction in the numbers of vehicle on roads. Before the year ended, many people were able to purchase at the new price which led to congestion of the cities with automobiles.
Though, the pump price increment will control the growing traffic and control pollution of the cities to certain extent, but, there are other measures that can be more effective. Enactment of ten years longevity law on vehicles, which means that, any car older than stipulated duration will be off-road. Furthermore, levying fines and taxes on car owners, prosecution of traffic laws offenders will serve as an example for others, all these, will go a long way. For example, In 2010, United States adopted the laws that no vehicle older than five years should ply the roads, as a result, traffic jam reduced drastically as well as preventing environmental pollution.
In conclusion, increasing the price of petrol will surely reduce traffic congestion as well as pollution to some extent but levying taxes and fines, punishing offenders of traffic laws, and legislating ten years longevity law on vehicles will not only be effective but permanently reduce traffic jams and, also encourage pollution free environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-14 | pourya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | lunhongquan | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | zukky | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | ayofigo | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job or shortage of money others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations discuss boths views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- New parents should attend parenting classes to learn how to bring up their children well To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your opinion supported by examples from your own experience 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e day as everywhere is littered with all manner of vehicles with consequential en...
^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...affic and environmental problems, which i am not in support. Increasing the pr...
^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
..., people will soon adapt and can afford buying at such price which will defeat the ini...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.078125 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6754800241 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7133649229 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0909090909 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178638316188 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790596179937 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730063632106 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124832164501 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287480835433 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.