Pie chart, land degeneration
The pie chart presents the most common causes of land degradation worldwide as well as in Europe, Oceania and North America in the 1990s.
While worldwide agricultural productivity loss is usually caused by over-grazing, in Europe, which is the territory with most degraded land, it is in great percent caused by deforestation. On the other side, North America is the least affected by the issue of the soil becoming poorer and Oceania's land mostly suffers from overgrazing.
The global split in reasons for agricultural productivity loss is rather equally split with over-grazing being the main reason with 35%, deforestation 30%, over-cultivation 28% and others at 7%.
In Europe, which with 23% of land degradation is most affected of the 3 territories, the main reason for it is deforestation with 9.8%. While in Oceania it is responsible for 1.3% out of 13% of total soil degeneration, the most common cause being overgrazing with 11.3%. The least loss of agricultural land productivity is observed in North America, where it affects 5% of the soil and is mainly an effect of over-cultivation, which accounts for 3.3% of land degradation.
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- Pie chart land degeneration 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table below shows the salaries of the anthropologist in work five years Summaries the information be selecting and reporting th 77
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet without any face to face contact with others To what extent is this a positive or negative development In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communi 84
- Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17741935484 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24587396067 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1272618138 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143048516231 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819721591843 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823200335592 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101334815228 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888336402481 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.