The Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Teaching by definition is the act of guiding or counseling to impact knowledge, which has been relative over the years. The statement is linking praising positive valves and ignoring negative valves as the best methods in teaching. A very common example is awarding and compensation of students that has exhibited excellent acts and has brought glory to their institutions, some are awarded scholarships and made the face of the schools in magazines and posters since inception of standard education. To bolster this statement, honest Uber drivers have been rewarded for their generous acts of returning expensive forgotten items. Trustworthy individuals are rewarded with appointment in government and all these examples collectively preached the effects of praising positive values.
The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic events to a reduction in negative values experienced in our society. The assumption is that increasing the rate of praising positive valves negates the rate of negative values exhibited in societies by ignoring them. Looking at the introduction, it would be argued that praising positive values will reduce the negative values in the society which will be strongly regarded as a fallacy. The best method to teach is to praise positive values and concurrently correct negative values creating a strong reinforcement for positive deeds.
However, supporting the statement on praising positive values and negative values preclude the unpredicted multi-personality of the human species. The human psychology is programmed to act differently to situations depending on circumstances, this has created an issue establishing the unpredictable state of humans. To this fact, more attention should be paid to correcting negative values and it is the only way positive valves can be normalized.
For example, the best student in the institution was involved in examination malpractice. The statement said this negative deed should be ignored which is unfair to other honest students in the school and it will create an environment where examinations malpractices is the order of the day and this will have an overhauling effect in corrupting the education standard of the institution and country at large causing an education pandemic of mediocre with good grades. The only solution to this complex problem is to guarantee strict corrections for any form of negative deeds.
In contrast to the statement, we can see how focusing on negative values serves as a better teaching method. Praising positive values and correcting negative values serves as the best teaching method creating a society where a good politician is punished for his involvement in a scandal, the best student is rusticated for examination malpractices, a doctor license is withdrawn for violating his oath.
This last example provides the most hope on how focusing on correcting negative valves provides the best teaching method. Consider the ancient China where corruption was very popular especially in government. This cost China her growth especially economically but using stricter and harsh punishment schemes for corrupt acts especially in government, the corruption is almost wiped out and they are enjoying the effect.
Given the unpredicted psychology of humans, anyone can exhibit positive or negative valves but focusing on correcting negative values first and praising positive values is the only way to achieve the best teaching method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- The Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news during this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 75
- creating a national curriculum for all post college education 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... way positive valves can be normalized. For example, the best student in the ins...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2936.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55009451796 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01672658549 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468809073724 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 927.9 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1277211845 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.80952381 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1904761905 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319161379922 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112466341304 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10459121097 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183582992147 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932532145156 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.