TPO22 – Independent: A/D? Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in classroom.
Students’ education has attracted much social concern. Several people argue that it is crucial for
teachers not to share their political and social viewpoints with students in the classroom.
Personally, I strongly agree with this argument.
On one hand, what has been put under consideration is study effectiveness. It is widely known
that by talking about political and social issues in the classroom, teachers are able to help
students to be away from difficult subjects in the school like math or science. As a result,
students stand a good chance of being relaxed. Therefore, it is possible for them to refresh their
mind and reduce stress and strain. Hence, they are likely to have more ideas and interests about
main subjects at schools. Thus, they are certain to study effectively. More notably, it cannot be
denied that teachers have a wonderful chance of socializing with their students when they talk
about non-academic issues. For this reason, they are able to narrow the gap between instructors
and learners. This is the opportunity for students to expose their hidden thought and problem
with their teachers. Subsequently, there is likelihood that teachers help students get over their
problem. Hence, it is possible for learners to improve their academic performance. Without
doubts, talking about non-academic issues is certainly undeniable when it comes to study
effectiveness.
On the other hand, some might say that talking about irrelevant topics in the lecture is extremely
time-consuming. As a consequence, it is impossible for students to study efficient. However, it is
just the surface of the problem. In fact, teachers known that they should talk about these topics
before or after the lecture. For this reason, teachers are able to ensure that students still
concentrate on the lecture. Besides, even if citing political and social issues in the classroom is
time-consuming, this time also is considered as the chance for students to know the new
perspective. Thus, there is likelihood that students perceive issues in life through different lens.
Accordingly, they are sure to reflect on themselves and find out what is right and what is wrong.
Therefore, it is possible for them to consolidate their background and improve their
understanding. Hence, they are likely to study more easily. For this reason, they are certain to
study more effectively. By and large, saying that citing political and social issues causes students
to decrease their academic performance is highly unrealistic.
In a word, study effectiveness is convincing reason for my agreement. It is highly recommended
that people should take my writing into detailed consideration to guideline an appropriate
decision on students’ education.
- TPO22 Independent A D Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in classroom 73
- Tpo51 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO37 integrated writing Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 70
- TPO37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, in fact, talking about, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46189376443 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96583097535 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475750577367 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5152501569 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5517241379 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9310344828 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96551724138 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.53405017921 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271882949612 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745084077463 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817616277257 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083015598947 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910826100124 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.