The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied bar chart illustrates the comparision of the divorce rates between Sweden and Finland from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, the trend in dissolution of marriage varied over the span of five years given with Finland on an upward and Sweden in decline. Initially, Finland had a lower rate but in 2015 it outstripped Sweden.
As is observed, the percentage of divorce, which commenced at around 38%, was nearly 10% lower than the one in Sweden. Then it plunged in the subsequent year to hit the botttom by roughly a third. However, there was a steady growth over the next two years to peaked at well above 40%. The number in 2015, despite impressive rates, ended the year not much above the previous year level and then officially overtaking the position of Sweden.
In terms of the divorce rates in Sweden, the year 2011 began with a dramatic climb and reached the zenith at under 50% afterwards. Following that it saw a descending trend and finally stopped by 45% in 2014 before plummeting to bottom out at under two thirds at the end of the given time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | view |
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 82
- The chart below five information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show some employment patterns in a developed country summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 11
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, then, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67553191489 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46801059132 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2354657559 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119532186851 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589684320021 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825841085186 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103624754019 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995594717783 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.