The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The chart illustrates information about the figure for dissolution of marriage in two different nations in Europe over the period course of 5 years starting in 2011.

All in all, it was obviously apparent that both countries have some fluctuations. Although initially Finland had low rates at the beginning, it outweighed Sweden at the end of the period. In particular, the number of Swedish who got failure in marriage in 2011 was higher, at nearly 43%, whereas the ratio of Finland made up an insignificant part with less than 40%. In 2012, the disparity between the number of two countries grew drastically as divorce levels in Sweden and Finland changed to nearly a half and a third respectively.

In the latter half of given period, there was an upward trend in the percentages of people living in Finland who broke up in marriage. Meanwhile, rates of divorce in Sweden gradually descended at that time. This led to a reversal of proportion in 2015, meaning the last year of time course when the number of divorce in Sweden held a smaller share than Finland’s.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly a half and a third respectively. In the latter half of given period, there ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, whereas, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87978142077 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7996919928 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8772105481 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118395710502 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533654646304 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368916209918 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862050367275 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214718484645 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.