Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
We have progressed rapidly with the technological revolution over the years. With this
advancement, our environment is undergoing a process of change which most of the times is not pleasant for us. Undeniably, technology
has simplified and enhanced our quality of living but at the same time, it’s misuse has brought up some discomforting issues which are detrimental for the stability of our environment. Now, to solve the anomalies of our ambience, what should we do, that’s a burning question for us. Should we change our lifestyle into a simpler one that we used to lead in pre-technological era or handle
machinery
to solve our environmental negative issues, that will be discussed later. I believe, environmental problems could be solved by implementing technology
in a proper way, instead
of exploiting it. Because, uncontrolled usage of
modern devices and machineries have created the problem with mother nature. For an explanation, we can have a look at some incidents that are happening around us, for instance
, deforestation, which means cutting down of trees indiscriminately, that is
highly pernicious for every living creature. Because, it is a tree that makes our ecosystem balanced, at the same time, maintains the approximate ratio between oxygen and carbon-dioxide. Not only that, to free up more spaces for industrial set up, we are filling our rivers, as a result
, aquatic lives are being endangered. All of these are the results of excessive demands of industrialization that impelling our nature on the verge of ravage. Therefore
, to reduce the harmful effects, we should you our technologies. As an example, to diminish solar radiation, georeflection
technique could be used. In this
method, mirrors could be implemented at selective area to reflect UV radiation. In addition
to that
, CFC free refrigerators can play a significant role in the reduction of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Besides
that, hydroelectric power plant could help to lowdown the consumption pressure of fossil fuel based electricity. Furthermore
, thousands of alternatives are there for thinking to conserve limited energy resources. Thus
, technology
can make a new way to deal with environmental problems. So, to me, it’s quite unnecessary to abort technology
to solve environmental errors. To illustrate, we can look over some other problems that are not linked up with technology
. One of such
one is the population rising problem that is
alluding problems to the environment. Because, the more is the pressure of consumption, the more will be the exploitation of natural resources. Therefore
, only leading a simple lifestyle won’t be a permanent solution, I believe. Hence
we should use technology
to solve recently cropped up problems. To sum up, the appropriate use of technology
can outweigh the problem of falling back in living style and that requires mass awareness on the pros and cons of the tech world and goodwill to save nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-15 | Sunzid_Ahmed | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | ahsan042 | 73 | view |
| 2017-11-15 | Manijot | 74 | view |
| 2015-06-09 | pratik_dkr1 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d be solved by implementing technology in a proper way, instead of exploiting it. Because, un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t are happening around us, for instance , deforestation, which means cutting down...
^^
Line 10, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... we are filling our rivers, as a result , aquatic lives are being endangered. All...
^^
Line 11, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ature on the verge of ravage. Therefore , to reduce the harmful effects, we shoul...
^^
Line 15, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lect UV radiation. In addition to that , CFC free refrigerators can play a signi...
^^
Line 17, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sil fuel based electricity. Furthermore , thousands of alternatives are there for...
^^
Line 18, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...conserve limited energy resources. Thus , technology can make a new way to deal ...
^^
Line 21, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that are not linked up with technology . One of such one is the population risi...
^^
Line 24, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itation of natural resources. Therefore , only leading a simple lifestyle won’t b...
^^
Line 25, column 77, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...n’t be a permanent solution, I believe. Hence we should use technology to solve rec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 470.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39787234043 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26670340968 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555319148936 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 4.76152304609 378% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2879844761 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.48 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.56 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20339616085 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594337202749 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498179439887 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556811483281 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585016460658 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.