There is an increasing trend of antisocial behavior by individuals and in most cases it is blamed on society. How can society be the blame? What needs to be done about these people?
Antisocial behavior is found common in today’s generation, and most individuals think this behavior is because of the toxic society. Wind this in mind, questions are raised that how society can the reason behind antisocial behavior? Also, what can be done about individuals who are suffering from this behavior? Misbehaving can have a huge negative effect on the minds of the young generation; however, developing this bad habit can be rehabilitated by imposing public punishment or high fines can be the solution.
Misbehaving can play a huge role in the development of antisocial behavior. The family environment has a critical influence on children’s psychological health. To further explain, in most families parents fighting constantly in front of their children can have a negative effect in their mind, and as a result, in order to relax their mind, they become drug addicts and destroy their life. In other families, parents set an example of conducting anti-social behavior such as lie or steal to get what they want. By observing that behavior as charming and powerful, kids mimic stealing and lying. Therefore, parents have the responsibility for their kids’ anti-social conduct.
With part of society being blamed now dismissed, attention can shift towards rehabilitation of this kind of behavior. As an initial point, rehabilitation centers have an obligation to deal with anti-social behavior, but they are not almighty, we as a society have to accept their part of responsibility. For example, alcoholism in considered common in most part of countries, and relatives commonly offer drinks to kid, this act is considered legal and civil authorities can do nothing about this, it is the responsibility of all of us to change this practice.
In conclusion, parents having anti-social behavior can result in children having the same conduct. In order to rehabilitate this kind of behavior, we have to work as a society and correct those rules which are against the law.
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle 61
- Goods transported in UK 73
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- waves as a source of energy 67
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28301886792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06319009834 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8652989285 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274291691267 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1038429396 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839789203996 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168806417513 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941910123106 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.