Employment rates
The line graph illustrates the differences between rates of job in three areas in the UK from 2000 to 2010, measured in millions.
Overall during the span of 10 years, the employment rate of the public sector and self-employed rose, whereas when talking about the private sector the number dropped rapidly year on year until it reached the bottom during the end of the time period.
Beginning with public sector jobs, it started at 38 million in the year 2000, and it remained steady for the next two years. On the other hand, the private sector started the journey at 49 million, but it dropped to just above 40 in 2002. However, the public sector overtakes private-sector jobs during the year 2003 and continues to rise until it reaches just under 50 in 2005. During the next five years, the public sector fluctuates and reaches the peak just above 50 during the year 2010. As far as the private sector is concerned it continues following a downward trend reaching 20 million in 2010.
Meanwhile, in the year 2000, the self-employed rates were recorded at the lowest at the time, but it showed a sudden upward trend in the year 2005. During the next four years, the number started growing until it reached its highest point 30 million in 2009, and remained constant the next year.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Waste disposal in four cities 67
- Energy usage in the USA 73
- Five countries birth rate 67
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om 2000 to 2010, measured in millions. Overall during the span of 10 years, the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eak just above 50 during the year 2010. As far as the private sector is concerned ...
^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...9, and remained constant the next year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75555555556 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3816168385 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6988336655 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142760424638 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645580747078 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980475882928 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127462827622 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906396128031 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.