Today many companies use advertisements on the Internet. Why? What problems does it create?
Nowadays, the internet has been a main advertisement resource of some companies. Considering the fact that the increasing number of social network users impacts proportionally marketing strategy of companies on the internet ; however, it causes two major detrimental effects for a humanity.
In comparison with the last decade, there is an upward tendency in the number of social media users as well as magazine readers on the internet. Thus some enterprises and agencies are determined to take advantage of their products by advertising on the online resources in order to involve more clients and making profit because of increasing power of mass media. A case in a point is that Xiaomi is one of companies that focus on the advertisement of their technologies advancements on media platforms, which brings them millions of clients and revenues every year.
On the other hand, advertising goods on the internet can lead to two major issues. First and foremost, while a great majority of companies try to make interest on customers to buy their products on the internet, customers may be stressful when they realize that the quality of purchased product doesn't reflect the promised effects of advertised one, thereby making them not to believe online resources again. Secondly, the reliability of the internet- based avertisements shared by companies is not in the same level compared to real based facts , meaning that the specification of products can be amended easily by different media websites which carries fake information at the same time. As a result, internet may seem as a platform where all information are electrically stored and can be easily hacked in cyber criminals.
To conclude, although, improving the image of companies can be affected by using advertisement methods on the internet, its drawbacks can not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | Mandeep khokhar | 78 | view |
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- Studying abroad pris and cons 89
- 3 spreads 73
- Today many companies use advertisements on the Internet Why What problems does it create 11
- Science and technology are more important than history 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ffects that can not be omitted. In comparison with the last decade, there is an upwar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ll as magazine readers on the internet. Thus some enterprises and agencies are deter...
^^^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sales have increased by over 60% as they On the other hand, advertising goods on ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significant issues. First and foremost, while a vast majority of companies try t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48161764706 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07185563417 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8401030927 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.1 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073563984284 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321631872049 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378063957224 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0449670054921 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00798921166252 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.