Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to

Essay topics:

Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.

A glance at people's attitudes toward working on projects brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether it is an excellent way to grade students based on group projects or evaluate them individually. Although most of my friends think that it is unfair to judge students' performance in a group, I, as a graduate business student, assert that group projects are a necessary part of modern education and enhance pupils' skill sets.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that students should prepare themselves for job requirements, and collaboration is one of the critical skills, that most companies mention in job descriptions. For learning cooperation, students do not have any place better than school, which enables them to know that the overall performance of the team is critical for the success of a business, and in the real world, no one assesses individuals' efforts. In other words, students learn that even if they work hard, when they do not motivate their colleagues or remind them of the deadlines, they cannot achieve their goals. Hence, universities are great places to encounter the reality of group projects.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that group projects help pupils broaden their horizons and get familiar with different characteristics, so when they enter society, they can tolerate a variety of personalities without major problems. This ability is so significant that it outweighs the importance of grades, and by requiring mandatory group projects, universities equip students to conduct successful research in a team later. Therefore, it is vital to teaching everybody how to work in groups.
Admittedly, there are some disadvantages of group projects that most students complain about, and one of them is unfairness. For example, if one member does not participate in activities and expects others to complete the assignment, other teammates have heavier workloads, and it is possible to get lower grades. However, this concern can be eliminated if the professor adds peer evaluations to grades and requires all students to submit it. In fact, when people understand that peer evaluation affects the score, they will have more active roles in group assignments.
Due to the aforementioned argument discussed in the previous statements, I highly recommend all high schools, colleges, and universities to add group projects to their curriculum and encourage students to enhance their collaboration skills.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-03 Pooja dave 90 view
2020-12-03 Pooja dave 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user nazbanu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'teach'?
Suggestion: teach
...a team later. Therefore, it is vital to teaching everybody how to work in groups. Admit...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28927680798 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97324424529 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586034912718 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1715553478 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287204569888 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969271211365 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607165139193 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164144146971 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056537835286 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.