Some people say that when on holiday in a foreign country, the best way to
get to know the people and their country is by saying in a hotel.
What is your opinion about this?
With the emergence of several means of transport, the tourism industry has grown rapidly in the past few decades. It is opined by some travelers that to reside in hotels provides better insights into the population and culture of a country. In this essay, I shall argue - contrary to popular opinion - that the people and heritage of a nation could be better understood by staying close to local dwellers rather than staying in hotels.
To begin with, admittedly, in some countries, hotels collaborate with small-scale tourism businesses to offer tour packages of limited time to some of the famous places along with a convenient and hassle-free stay. Although such collaborations are lucrative from their business point of view, it does not always offer the best opportunities for the tourists to harvest the cultural and local information of the place they are visiting. Besides, the availability of such offers is not prevalent in the majority of nations.
However, on the other hand, the optimum ways to understand and learn about cultural heritage, language, and lifestyle of the native population of any country would be to seek accommodation among the local people and being a part of their everyday life. For instance, a recent survey by the Economic Times shows that approximately 80 percent of international tourists preferred to dwell up in lodgings situated near the domestic areas during their visit to know the actual way of living in the destination country. Moreover, the information about food, places to visit, and festivals of any nation that is collected by interacting with the local public could not be substituted by the one that is showcased by the hotels and is displayed on the online websites.
Having seen the above points, it can be concluded that to gather information about the people, lifestyle, and local culture of any place, hotels are not the best option to get accommodated. Alternatively, travelers should consider living between local people at guest houses when they visit a new place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-07 | Jaskaran Kaur | 92 | view |
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime Do you agree or disagree 89
- In modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with other people without face to face contact Is this a positive or negative development 89
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for him her Write a letter to this friend In your letter tell your frien 89
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money either to sponsor a local children s sports team for two years or to pay for two open air concerts It has asked for feedback from the general public Write a letter to the company 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'several means'.
Suggestion: several means
With the emergence of several means of transport, the tourism industry has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... offer tour packages of limited time to some of the famous places along with a convenient a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14803625378 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85438555319 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1504999533 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18358982461 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599264519227 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397173056409 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103106742629 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311042839229 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.