Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
In today's hectic life, television has a paramount role in everyone's lives. Controversy exists whether television advertisements are proper for young children to watch. In my vantage point, TV advertisements are not suitable for children and we should not let them to watch because not only has it harmful effects on children's brain, but also they may learn inappropriate habits from it.
First of all, TV advertisements affect children's brains and life. Psychologists believe that children at the age of two to five are not wise enough to distinguish imagination from reality thus they can easily believe some scary stories or myths. In addition, they might be terrified from some advertisements and this will cause them sleep problems which have direct consequences on children's brain growth. For instance, imagine an infant child at the age of three. He probably would see some toy advertisements between his cartoons. One advertisement is about a war including gun toys and tanks. This will stick into the kid's mind and he might be scared. He will possibly think about that war for days or months and even have nightmares. Therefore, we should be aware of the harms of TV advertisements on our children's growth.
Secondly, children can learn dangerous or inappropriate hobbies from TV advertisements. That is to say, they can find some tasks done in the TV interesting, so they would try them at home and hurt themselves. Moreover, children might see unsuitable scenes and learn them. Also, they can teach their improper learnings to the other kids and have an unpleasant influence on others and the society. For example, take the case of a child who is always in front of the TV. An advertisement will come which is about a boy who climbs the house's roof to watch the sunset. If the kid watches this, he would probably be encouraged to do the same task to watch the sunset, and obviously, it is remarkably perilous and he might fall off the roof. Thus, TV advertisements can teach improper habits to children and it should not be available for young children to watch.
All in all, it is not suitable for young kids to watch television advertisements and the advertising toward them should be banned since it has damaging effects on children's brains and they can learn hazardous jobs. It is recommended for parents not to allow your kids watch TV at the very young ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Muggle1313 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90594059406 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89815019986 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502475247525 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1228852088 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227076738765 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723804009577 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635838898035 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160424717803 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371259889057 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.