Casein-based plastic packaging
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not casein-based plastic packaging can cause harm to environment. The author strongly postulates that casein based plastic packages have several advantages. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that those benefits mentioned in the passage are not correct and have various flaws in it.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, large amount of waste is reduced by casein. In other words, their wraps are biodegradable and can easily be dissolved in water. Nevertheless, the lecturer offsets these points by declaring that casein is vulnerable to water and high temperature, which means one would have to use synthetic one.
Next, the author contends that food in casein plastic packages can stay fresh as it is much more effective in blocking oxygen. The professor refutes these arguments. He clears out that because casein is vulnerable to water and high temperature, it can absorb water molecules easily that act as a plasticizer. It is highly sensitive to water and as a result, it can affect water and hygiene greatly.
The text lastly asserts that casein bags can be nutritious as it contains high number of proteins and other edible substances, which can be really great for enzyme production. However, the speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that there are a large number of people who is allergic to milk. Consequently, these individuals do not want to experience products like this which can be a really big thread to them. Therefore, it clearly shows that the author's benefits of using casein are not accurate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | Huge Jackman | 71 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Safa Arshad | 42 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Pravin s. jadhav | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | 29roysoma | 81 | view |
- For making long lasting friendship which ONE do you prefer 1 Friends who help you when you need or in dire situations 2 Friends who share the same thinking and characteristics 3 Friends who trust each other 70
- TPO 30 burning mirror 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage Nutria is a beaver like rat sized approximately 24 inches long growing up to 20 pounds and usually living in semi aquatic habitats T 83
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages Which type of communication do you prefer and why 70
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not casein-based plastic packaging can caus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...indications by insisting that there are a large number of people who is allergic to milk. Consequ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, lastly, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1962962963 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78273385033 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4056650671 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28656692261 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107555316509 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153629313383 0.0662205650399 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178486620871 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138962829502 0.0443174109184 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.