Recently published figures show wildlife population around the world has decreased by around 50 over the last 50 years What can we do to help protect the wildlife round the world

Essay topics:

Recently published figures show wildlife population around the world has decreased by around 50% over the last 50 years. What can we do to help protect the wildlife round the world?

Together we can make a difference to Wildlife protection
The subject of discussion is one of the most important challenges that our world faces today. We the people, have a moral responsibility and obligation to protect, nurture and ensure the necessary conditions are in place to ensure the continuation of our wildlife species.
Now, let us first discuss the main issues that have resulted in a 50% depletion of wildlife population. To me, the answer to this question is very simple. Expansion of cities into protective habitats, rampant felling of trees, global warming, corruption in wildlife ministries around the world, lack of support and development of villages and poaching of wild animals for their flesh, fur, tusks are some of the major reasons.
The challenges ahead of us are daunting, I know and understand we cannot change behaviour overnight, but I am sure if we focus on the top issues and put measures in place it will go a long way to arresting this trend. We can do this!
The solutions to my mind are as follows. Global wildlife agreements to be honoured in letter and spirit. Strict action and persecution to poachers, we need to break and disrupt their clandestine operations. Wildlife officers should have state of the art equipment to track, manage the wildlife population. Planning of cites to be done in a scientific way to ensure harmony with nature and that we do not encroach on reserved wildlife areas. Supply of water by way of forest conservation to ensure there is adequate supply of water in the forests. This will prevent wild animals wandering out of their natural habitat for food and water. We need to let wild animals live in peace and propagate, which is their right. Villages bordering the forests should be given special attention and support to sustain themselves so that they do not wander into the forests looking for food.
In conclusion, even though the challenges ahead are daunting, we together with determination can do this. We must, we have to for the sake of our incredible wildlife and for the benefit of mankind.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-14 pameladsouza 67 view
Essays by user pameladsouza :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...animals for their flesh, fur, tusks are some of the major reasons. The challenges ahead of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...rations. Wildlife officers should have state of the art equipment to track, manage the wildlife...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a scientific way" with adverb for "scientific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...opulation. Planning of cites to be done in a scientific way to ensure harmony with nature and that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92022792023 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77526806048 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54415954416 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1848819763 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.588235294 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29411764706 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227014088364 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702904020117 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515583894041 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131929798391 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448138499306 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.