Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends?
• Joining a sports team
• Participate in community activities
• Traveling.
Since the dawn of humanity, friends have a vital role in people's lives. In this connection, there are several methods for finding friends. Although some people believe that they can find friends in their sports team, many others hold the view that attending community activities is a useful way. There is still a third group concurring with the notion that people can build a relationship in travels. I agree with the last group's opinion, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, when people do not experience stress in their lives, especially during trips, they could focus on finding new friends. To be more specific, travels are a beneficial avenue in which one can cope with their daily mental pressure wonderfully, so good-tempered behavior helps them to establish a friendship. According to my own experience, when I was a first-year university student, I should complete many tasks. A considerable amount of mental tension made my facial expression depressed, so all of my classmates avoid me. Finally, on the last day of the semester, my university planed a trip, in which all my classmates participate. Because I did not have any homework, and I was on the trip, I felt relaxed as well as energetic. Hence, I communicate with my classmates impressively, thereby making new friends and having a fun time together.
Secondly, a wealth of time that people should spend together on a trip help them to be familiar with other beliefs and personality, which is an essential factor to make new friends. To elucidate, during journeys, people spend several days together; moreover, they do the same activities, which helps them to comprehend travelers' interests. For example, last month, my professor asked one student and me to travel to Italy and visit an art exhibition, but I did not know him before. As we spent a vast quantity of time together on the trip, we became familiar with each other according to the reaction that we had in different situations, so we understand each other characteristics gradually. Thus, this trip provides an ideal opportunity for us to find a suitable person whom we can trust in difficulties by spending time together. Otherwise, we could not develop a relationship by spending two hours a week at university.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that travelers become friends readily. Not only do they spend time together with relaxation, but they also allocate time together.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly when a leader takes too much time to make decisions he will be seen as inefficient to the people he leads 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends 71
- Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti 96
- Whether hydrogen fuel cell engines are better substitute for internal combustion engines or not 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...nship in travels. I agree with the last groups opinion, and I will analyze my reasons ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06812652068 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93129897149 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549878345499 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7703587486 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164104788825 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047465872611 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467224088747 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960994433012 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191569218568 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.