The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph demonstrates the consumptions of six different energy from 1980 to 2008 and the projections to 2030 in the USA.
It is clear that petrol and oil was by far the most important fuel and would still rank on the top in the future 20 years. Hydropower, however, was the only resource that would consume less in 2030.
In 1980, petrol and oil were the main sources of fuel in the USA with the consumption of 35 quadrillions, following by the use of natural gas with just half of its usage (20 quadrillions). The consumptions of nuclear, solar/ wind and hydropower were the same, around 4 quadrillions by Americans.
1980 to 2008 saw the usages of petrol and oil, coal and nuclear rose with fluctuation. After this period, the consumptions of petrol and oil and coal would keep increasing to their peak in 2030, with the prediction of 46 quadrillions and 29 quadrillions respectively. The annual consumptions of natural gas, nuclear, solar/ wind and hydropower would probably have no significant change in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development 53
- in some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel petrol 84
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the projections to 2030 in the USA. It is clear that petrol and oil was by f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88068181818 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9676664508 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3595285704 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236501191422 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11250963934 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131081084409 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179355871527 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15606177557 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.