Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, family relationships are influenced by lifestyle. In this connection, they are several avenues that can affect families' connection. Although contested by many that the matter of eating meals with a family is beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it is helpful to have meals with whom people are related, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, as having meals with siblings and parents improves family friendships, it is vital for them. To be more specific, eating lunch together provides an ideal opportunity for members of a family to communicate with each other, so it provides insight into their situation. According to my own experience, my sister is a nurse, so she should go to a hospital after lunch, but other members of my family work until noon. Therefore, we can just see my sister when eating lunch, which helps us to communicate with her, and do not allow our binding to become weak. Even less time dedicated to have a meal with her is an asset method to comprehend each other personality and feelings.
Secondly, consuming meals with a family is essential since it reduces digestion diseases. To elucidate, experiencing stress during eating causes digestion problems; however, being in the family environment makes people feel relax, leading to maintaining health. For example, when I eat my lunch at my work with colleagues, they speak about difficulties in duties and the number of job tensions they have. This I think about my problems, which I should deal with them at work, makes me eat my launch with a tremendous amount of stress. By doing so, I suffer from stomachache after lunch; on the other hand, eating meals with my family helps me to abandon the mental pressure that I experienced at work, so I have a pleasant time and enjoy meals without feeling any health problems.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that spending time with parents, sisters, and brothers during meals can be a plus. Not only does having a meal with parents strengthen their connection, but it also decreases the risks of becoming sick.
- Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration 76
- new teaching method professor record a video lecture in advance for students to learn class time used to answer questions and have discussions Do you think this is an effective way and why 76
- Nowadays many movies or films are based on books Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie others prefer to watch the movie before reading the book Which one do you prefer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd each other personality and feelings. Secondly, consuming meals with a family ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o decreases the risks of becoming sick.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98677248677 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78802970848 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0315713049 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8125 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245193019557 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954480600086 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517442223001 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161024534073 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262060028069 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.