Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life.
A controversial issue relating to whether people should try different jobs before they decide a long term career, or just strive to find their ideal job, has brought to the attention of relevant people. Many people think that individuals should not waste their time trying jobs that they do not need to work. On the contrary, in my opinion, people should have the willing to try different types of jobs before they choose their long term career.
First of all, working in a variety of jobs will help people to expose themselves to a diverse environment, which could spark their interest in things that they never thought before. My own experience as a young adult who was unsure what major to choose, is a compelling example of this. About two decades ago, when I was in my freshman year, I was not sure what major to choose. I tried to engage myself on different workplaces, such as I volunteered as an assistant at the local emergency department, and also as an assistant at my local pharmacy. After I exposed myself to all these different disciplines, I realized that pharmacy was what I liked the most. Had I not volunteered, I would not have experienced and found out what major I liked to pursue. Even though some people may see it as an unnecessary move to waste time volunteering, it is crucial that young adults experience the work in the first place. This is because they will better understand the meaning of the work after they do it on their own. That is why, being exposed to different workplaces might help students to realize what they really like to do.
Furthermore, working in different places will allow people to make new friends, and expand their social network. For instance, After I worked on each place for approximately two years, I was able to make lots of friends with whom I still have an amazing relationship. To be more specific, when I need them they always show up for me. What is more, my new friends that I met at emergency department always encourage me to stay as a strong, confident, and never give up for my dreams. Had I not worked on those places, I would not have expanded my social network and may life would have been just vague.
In conclusion, people should work different types of jobs. This is because that will help them to expose themselves in different workplaces and discover what they really like. And because, they will get to expand their social network, which will change their lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Tpo 16 Do you agree or disagree with the statement The best way to travel is in a group led by tour guide 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 60
- Tpo 18 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, what is more, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69555035129 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59741247463 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494145199063 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2436201282 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307858806129 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101283420009 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124085168145 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217118124082 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194208758494 0.0645574589148 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.