An essay featuring two graphs, a pie chart, and a bar chart, related to students in Singapore from 2000 to 2010.
The given list of graphs compares the time(in years) spent in school by the students on a gender basis in the bar-graph and classified on the educational level in the pie-charts. The survey was done in Singapore over a period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that boys led the girls, despite a uniform increase in the number of years for both the genders. Also, over time, University degree holders rose dramatically, compared to the secondary schoolers who were maximum as per the earlier report.
According to the given illustration, lately, in the year 2000, girls fell below boys by about two schooling years (boys 7.5 years as against girls 5.5 years).
However, with the passing years, an upward trend steadily pushed the number of school years for both the sexes by an equal amount. After a decade, whilst male students climbed to a peak period of more than 9 years, girls left behind by nearly 1.5 years.
Turning to the pie charts, in 2000, nearly one out of four students went to different achievement areas, with the highest of 27.7% in secondary school. However, with a reverse trend, only 8% appeared for a secondary school in 2010. Also, with the highest proportion, the University degree accounted for 44.5%, nearly double the previous value. In addition, three in every ten opted for a diploma as against only 16.3% of college students.
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course in university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the above vi
- Universities should offer equal opportunities to males and females on the education front To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The diagram below shows how the instant noodles are manufactured 63
- An essay featuring two graphs a pie chart and a bar chart related to students in Singapore from 2000 to 2010 74
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s as against girls 5.5 years. However, with the passing years, an upward trend ...
^^
Line 8, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Turning to the pie charts, in 2000, nearly one out of four students went to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90456431535 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51305710263 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589211618257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8418094091 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152279702331 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578791303331 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582746267834 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862079558111 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783216975006 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.