TPO 63
The reading states that being an invasive, cheetgrass causing many problems in Morth American field such as swift dominating fields and providing severe damage to local animals. The passage propose three solution to cheatgrass problem. However, the professor explains that these solutions are not to work.
First, the article claims that evcoraging cattale and other livestock to feed on cheagrass can reduce the amount of the cheatgrass. Therefore, in this way native species could reestablish themselves and flourish again. The speaker refures this point by saying that the cheatgraas is not a kind of plant that cattle and other livestock prefer to feed on. Also he is saying that, there are still kinds of other planets they prefer to use first so releaseing them in fields where cheatgrass is prevalent will have an opposit effect.
Second, the author states that a vast anount of the cheatgrass could be eliminated in a short time if it burns, and this is possible because it burns easily than other native plant specie. However, the lecturer contends that it is true that the cheatgrass burns easily but it doesn't mean it won't quickly comeback. He aserts that, many cheatgraass's seed pushdown below the surface and fire cannot hurt it, and also, these seeds in the soil could spread and reproduce.
Third, the reading passage avers that using a fungal parasite could be beneficial to prevent cheatgrass from reproducing. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that the cheatgrass and the fungal live togheter for thousands of years and for now, the cheatgrass is able to resistant against the fungal. He also states that this fungal parasite hust can hurt some cheargrass bieng waek or sick. Consecuntly, entring the fungal to North America is not beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | Percival Wong | 73 | view |
- Opinions of celebrities 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Being creative rather than planning carefully helps people come up with the best solution to a problem 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Patience is usually not a good strategy We should take action now rather than later 42
- TPO42 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proposes'.
Suggestion: proposes
...re damage to local animals. The passage propose three solution to cheatgrass problem. H...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... and other livestock prefer to feed on. Also he is saying that, there are still kind...
^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that the cheatgrass burns easily but it doesnt mean it wont quickly comeback. He asert...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12671232877 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53527145141 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0261262026 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859644454599 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288034451704 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307737021501 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501447155292 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155031049662 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.