Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, people have been responsible for various tasks being assigned to them, and they have made an effort to accomplish them appropriately. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is about the effects of being busy on a completed task qualification. Opinions are divided into whether hectic schedules have disabled people from performing efficiently, or they can manage multiple tasks properly. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that being occupied with different projects simultaneously will make the situation intolerable for any individuals. There are several reasons to support this, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, without a shadow of a doubt, although humans' intellectual abilities are well-developed, in case of a challenging environment, such as doing a myriad of things, they will be less effective. In other words, when a person is inundated with massive responsibilities, he/she becomes tired of tedious tasks. This will result in less concentration on, and eventually, tasks can not be successfully accomplished. Take my personal experience as a compelling example of this. A couple of years ago, when I was a freshman student, I was encumbered with multiplicity of tasks. Therefore, I did not sleep to complete my assignments; however, the pressure I went under resulted in potential and definite failure. In consequence, I lost the opportunity of being a top student and used the advantages of that.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that, tight deadlines in conjunction with being overly burdened with various chores, lead to an inadequate amount of attention being allocated for the specific tasks. To be more specific, it is a precarious situation when an individual wants to prioritize his/her tasks. In the aforementioned position, an individual is not able to bring all his/her duties to fruition. According to statistics, most of the students justify their defaults and mention a shortage of time as a prominent factor in their failure. Most of them declared that had they had an ample amount of time, they would have performed more successfully.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that busy people do not perform accurately. The fact that pending responsibilities make them tired, coupled with the pressure of deadlines on people, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25879396985 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20777921288 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9858848572 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.157894737 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134142195646 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384023440392 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349767191145 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860673539926 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286550226869 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.