Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, people have been seeking ways to fulfill not only themselves but also their families. Working is one of the prominent factors in people's satisfaction. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is about the job's prospection. Opinions are divided into whether it is more likely to predict one's prospering job, or this was more accessible in the past. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that people had a significant amount of chance to foretell about one's occupation. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, these days, life has become more intricate, which is almost impossible to predict the future with instabilities in global affairs, especially in politics and economy. People of the developing country are working in a turbulent economic situation in which they are not able to meet their basic amenities. Therefore, there is less chance for them to be sure of whether this job will lead to success or they go bankrupt. As a case in point, in my country where people find no stability in different aspects of society, it may put them in difficulties to start a new job because every day they have to face various hurdles and manage them. As a result, an individual's status is not predictable.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that with the growth of technology, people have launched and established their novel businesses, which had not been existed before. Therefore, there is neither authentic information nor clear data that demonstrates a job's efficiency. To be more specific, people have been using some widespread social applications since they have been invented. Moreover, some individuals use these applications to work online and via the internet and sell their products; meanwhile, people purchase them to avoid dense traffic and also save their precious time. As a result, they allocate their time to accomplish other tasks appropriately.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that in the past, people ensured of their job destiny. The fact that they encounter precious economic environment, coupled with the advent of numerous unprecedented occupations, is the fact that strengthens my claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and examples to 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
... no consensus among people is about the jobs prospection. Opinions are divided into ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...cant amount of chance to foretell about ones occupation. To support this, there are ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 672, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...urdles and manage them. As a result, an individuals status is not predictable. Another wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...tion nor clear data that demonstrates a jobs efficiency. To be more specific, people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11749347258 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89999942407 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566579634465 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9826354624 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943149102554 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297008237324 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285800519703 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605179052251 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00969892859119 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.