living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make. discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion.
What is the best place for individuals to live is argued during the year where they have had lots of choices in order to choose the suitable and favorite one for themselves. Two main choices have been in the city or countryside which both simultaneously have pros and cons. This essay is going to talk about both benefits and drawbacks for them as well as the writer’s opinion which is interested in living in metropolises.
On the one side of this issue, living in the big cities have gained advantages and disadvantages at the same time. One of the main of its benefits has been easy access and public transport for all residents. In fact, comparing to rural areas, in cities everyone could use any kind of transport such as bus, train, undergrounds so it is more convenient but in countryside if a dweller do not have their private transport like own car, they will have so much trouble to get around. Another advantage is related to not only wide range of amenities which have been allocated to various part of society like better education and jobs, but also the lots of choices of stores and markets that citizen have to go and shop such as chain stores. Moreover, much more facilities for entertainment such as theaters or museums and also lively bars and restaurants have been another satisfying factors for living in these cities. For the dark side of this type of living should consider the congestion of traffic which has propelled metropolises to not only have more air pollution, but also make an incessant roar from the vehicles. This issue has led them to have less relaxing lifespan and have a high pace of living which has made people to be more nervous and have lots of health problems such as respiratory diseases.
On the other hand, exactly like cities, countryside has several benefits and also drawbacks. The first advantages which could not be overlooked is the comfort and less stressing life in the suburb as a result of low speed of life. And this is because of fewer population, less noise making from cars and industrial companies. This has led people to be in a better health condition for both physical and mental. Furthermore, resulting of having less bumper-to-bumper traffic, their air pollution are much lower. In addition, the cost of living may be lower than metropolises, and also dwellers would have bigger house than high-rise flats with small dimension. Despite those benefits which was mentioned, there are some adverse drawbacks, too. The main one is fewer job opportunities and also facilities for both entertainment and education than cities. This has propelled some individuals to waste a great deal of their day to day life to commute between the cities and their living areas on the outskirt.
In conclusion, regarding all the satisfying and negative aspects of both of the locations, I myself prefer living in cities especially in my twenties in order to earn more money so for my retirement years I would be able to live out of the cities. Overall, everyone should consider all the factors and then select their chief temptation in order to provide the best live that they could have imagined for themselves.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- linear process 78
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 78
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful What is your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 1615.20841683 163% => OK
No of words: 542.0 315.596192385 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84870848708 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69538946825 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487084870849 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0024863204 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8095238095 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26491710712 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874432405996 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623497350745 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182967889046 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525928479882 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.