Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
Not being able to communicate in the local language where one resides can have a serious impact on one’s professional and personal life. So, I agree with the author’s opinion for the following reasons.
Communication is an important aspect in our everyday life and this becomes difficult when one stays in a foreign country without being able to speak the native language. In other words, they can cause practical problems. For instance, imagine an American living in Japan, where most of the people converse only in Japanese. He/she would definitely have a hard time for the tiniest thing possible, such as asking for directions. Situation might get more complicated in the workplace where communication is the key to success. That is why it is crucial to at least know the basics of the language before travelling to a foreign country.
Further, in such conditions having a personal or social life might just be a dream for some people. To maintain a social life one needs to able to express emotions and feelings which does not seem to be possible when one can barely get through the day without speaking the indigenous language. Let us take the example of the American who learns the rudimentary Japanese words to get by the day and the sentences needed to help him/her at workplace. Now these can’t be applied when he/she tries to make friends. It might be difficult to make a connection and have someone to share your experiences. However, if one tries hard enough to learn the local slang and jargons things might turn positive.
To conclude, I strongly believe that being able to communicate in the native language definitely has its perks and supports a person in their personal and professional life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-08 | necromancer2610 | 56 | view |
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and more mysterious 50
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- In the past few years Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications The reason can be discovered from our students who most often cite poor teaching and inadequate library resources as their chief sourc 60
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently if companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, at least, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9175257732 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70196638313 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.468810234 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17545272245 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580509916822 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488235567234 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105522420897 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586006815637 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, at least, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9175257732 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70196638313 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.468810234 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17545272245 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580509916822 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488235567234 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105522420897 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586006815637 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.