"As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious"
Knowledge is nothing but information or data acquired through the course of a person's life. Having basic knowledge about the day to day activities makes life easier and this knowledge never gets complex. Well the given issue has been discussed from different point of views in the succeeding paragraphs.
The issue mentioned above states that gaining information about something is directly proportional to increase in its complexity. Which might be true in some of the cases. For example, up until 50 years ago scientists considered Atom to be the smallest element. But after years of research and cutting open the atom, the element smaller than atom was discovered. One can definitely say that this discovery changed the understanding of the universe.
There are still several unsolved mysteries in the world like the Bermuda triangle and Black hole. Research is still going on for these mysteries, but nothing conclusive. Scientists have gathered tons of information on such cases and the more they gain about them the more complex it gets to solve the mystery.
On the other hand in cases like a child learning to walk and talk would not have much to learn. Most of the knowledge gained by him would be by observing the adults around him and no matter how much he learns it will not get more complicated than just walking and talking.
Thus, in light of the above it is clear that the statement holds true for certain cases where the deeper one digs the more information one receives about it. When there is nothing new to learn about something, they just stay simple and comprehensible.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently if companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children while other people disagree for many reasons Consider both sides of this debate and conclude 61
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...r data acquired through the course of a persons life. Having basic knowledge about the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ortional to increase in its complexity. Which might be true in some of the cases. For...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... its complexity. Which might be true in some of the cases. For example, up until 50 years a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 270.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91851851852 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61208544994 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6452991341 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5333333333 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170627487798 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458114172907 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743653255389 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930302106347 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671869302564 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.