People's poor health is because of lifestyle, how the lifestyle influences the health. And how national/health services should response to the issue? how should health/medical department responds？
Recently, the phenomenon of "people's poor health is because of lifestyle, how the lifestyle influences the health" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the response of medical departments might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the health service can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the physiology standpoint, the lifestyle can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the shape of the body and preventing obesity are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the influences of physical exercises. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both physical activities and improving the health of people distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of medical science, without the slightest doubt, the poor health of people might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of well-being of adults. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the roles of national health services can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of funding can pertain to federal budgets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the roles of medical departments were correlated positively with an active lifestyle, the local authorities would ultimately address the poor health of children. Thus, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the relationship between the health and the lifestyle.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the lifestyle alongside national health services far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-27 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both view and give your own opi 89
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 75
- What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of the education system in your country Use your own experience to support your idea 85
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
- some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67918088737 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19537415069 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8722334513 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.272727273 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383930160369 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129405267198 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881738796699 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212556593629 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097827020119 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.