If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue is of the view that when a goal is valuable, then any action to obtain that goal is acceptable. As far as I am concerned, I cannot agree this idea, and I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To start with, the definition of a goal “being worthy” is not an absolute standard. The value of an object for a certain group will not necessarily be the same for another group. Therefore, the means which are utilized in the path of achieving a specific goal matter. For example, environmental activists maintain that abstaining meat consumption is crucial for preventing the global warming issue. They assert that if all people stop using meat as their main dishes and replace it with herbal foods, the process of global warming will eventually vanish. On the other hand, many people around the world, especially children, need to consume protein which meat is a rich resource of it, and cutting that amount of nutritious material will harm their health. As it can be seen, the activists’ goal is valuable in their point of view, but boycotting the meat consumption is not plausible for many people.
Secondly, not all means taken to making an aim happen are always ethical. The elites of societies have established rules and protocols to lay lines of morality, preserving the benefits of the society members. There are some valorous goals that a specific group might try to achieve, but the means of that would harm some other groups, and that is not acceptable. For instance, many pharmaceutical products have side-effects, and for determining those effects, the scientists perform experiments on animals. In a society that cherishes the animal rights, this action annoys the groups of animal right advocates, and cause contradictions between these two groups. Therefore, if a practice considered as amoral action it would not be justified as a mean to attain a goal.
However, some goals which are too valuable to reach, there are boundaries that put the validity of means under question. We cannot claim that “any” object is justifiable to take to reach a specific aim.
To sum up, the assertion that it is acceptable to practice any means to attain a valuable goal is not applicable to every situation, and the exactitude of the “value” of the goal depends on the group who is following it, not all individuals of a society. Additionally, the morality and ethical issues related with the means of achieving the goal is something that cannot be overlooked. If the points that are mentioned above be more clear, then the authors claim can be plausible in my perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-27 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y reasons in the following paragraphs. To start with, the definition of a goal ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion is not plausible for many people. Secondly, not all means taken to making ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...justified as a mean to attain a goal. However, some goals which are too valuab...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to take to reach a specific aim. To sum up, the assertion that it is acce...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93018018018 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82731765885 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9073680872 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.45 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178836450631 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568362966954 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349273978148 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103705348273 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144874925096 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.