Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
The environment children grow up in is extremely important since it is related to their development of personality and body development. Personally, I believe that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, to concern children’s health, parents should raise their children in the countryside. There is a study showing that the amount of people having allergies who grew up in a city is higher than the number of people who grow up in the countryside due to air pollution. Further, living in rural areas not only benefit physical health but mental health. My childhood experience is a compelling illustration. When I was in elementary school, I always visited my grandparents on the weekend. My grandparents’ house was located in a small village, and I was fascinated by the surroundings and the view because of the spacious grass and fresh air. I felt peaceful when I was there, and I only could hear the sounds from birds and insects. In contrast, when I came back to my city, the lifestyle I experience was another story. It was crowded and noisy, and everything in the city made me feel depressed. Thus, I feel that children growing up in the countryside may have a better health status.
Moreover, there is more space for kids to do activities and develop their characteristics in the countryside. Besides this, children living in rural places have more chances to explore nature. Consider two of my nephews, for instance. The one living in a big city usually plays video games and learns piano in his leisure time. On the other hand, another nephew usually rides a bike around the farms and has an adventure in the forest. He likes to capture different insects, such as beetles, butterflies, and crickets. He is always curious about unknown creatures, and once he sees unfamiliar plants, he will try to find out the answers. Since he needs to find out the way when he gets lost in the forest, he is more independent than his other cousins. If he had learned that knowledge from textbooks, he would not have remembered them that well. Therefore, I think that exploring in nature is helpful to children’s personality development.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that parents should raise children in the countryside. This is because children can have a better environment for their health, and have more opportunities to evolve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | Doggie | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90887290168 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93821459849 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517985611511 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3237285681 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.88 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.68 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183862446903 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523565705891 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646864818091 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130464922119 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735526950587 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.