Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has.
People would like to understand a person before making a friend or cooperate with him or her. Personally, I think that we can know a person from his or her friends indirectly. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, most people usually build a friendship with the ones they like or someone who is similar to them. It is reasonable not to make friends with people who have different values since it is not comfortable, and most people would like to relax while they are hanging out with their friends. Thus, our friends are similar to us in some aspects, such as habits, personalities, and backgrounds. Consider a classmate of mine, for instance. He is the person who enjoys life the most I have ever seen. He seldom comes to school, always asks others to have a party together, and is always busy with recreation activities. Further, he is dating with so many different girls at the same time and likes to show off how rich his parents are. I also noticed that most of his friends are just like him. In short, we can actually understand a person from what kind of friends he or she has.
Moreover, although sometimes we should get along with people to know them more instead of knowing them from others' mouths, the stories of them the friends told are sometimes true. When we talk to some people, they share the stories of their friends as the conversation topics. They mention the stories unintentionally, while they still reveal some information about their friends. My personal experience is a compelling illustration. Once I heard a story about my neighbor, she said one of her friends is the same age as me and is hard-working and diligent, so she got the offer for one of the outstanding universities in my country. The next time I actually saw her is in the company I work, she is usually the last one taking off the work, and she has never been late for the work. She is smart and responsible for her job, as my neighbor described. Therefore, the information we get from people's friends accidentally sometimes is reliable.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that people can understand others according to their friends. This is because most people get along with the ones they like or the ones who are similar to them. Additionally, people sometimes reveal their friends' personalities or interests, so it is a way to know what kinds of a person is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-16 | Lindsey0101 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
| 2018-07-24 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-17 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
| 2017-06-08 | peerless alex | 92 | view |
- The cane toad is a large 1 8 kg amphibian species native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers crops by eating harmful insects Unfortunately the toad multiplied 80
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 88
- Do you agree or disagree One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tivities. Further, he is dating with so many different girls at the same time, and likes to sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in short, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63636363636 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68407807903 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473193473193 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6018521373 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4782608696 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18753164432 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641680215294 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616506522276 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14442499446 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432909749679 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.