The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A deep analysis of the line graph provided reveals a relative alteration price for the market, e.g., fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
For an overall view, this graph shows us the distinction about how the market's prices could be increased by the time. In 1978, all the prices were steady at the same point which was in approximately between 50 and 100. Nevertheless, by going to the end of 2009, the consumer-price index was experiencing changes. It affected the prices of markets that had occurred during the increasing years.
As seen in the graph above, The highest point was reached by fresh fruits and vegetables line, i.e., in approximately between 300 and 350 in the end of 2009. Nonetheless, it declined slightly in the middle of 1893 and 1895 below an average price among the markets. On the contrary, the lowest point was reached by the carbonated drinks line, i.e., in roughly 150 in the final year. For the sugar and sweets line, it hold out the near point roughly same as the consumer-index price, i.e., in 200.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed by the carbonated drinks line, i.e., in roughly 150 in the final year. For th...
^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holds'?
Suggestion: holds
...year. For the sugar and sweets line, it hold out the near point roughly same as the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., nevertheless, nonetheless, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83957219251 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68515235715 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8095890831 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290044162879 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114886022818 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877402021073 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223597567032 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855133393143 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.