The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, traffic congestion has become a grave problem in metropolitan cities. Therefore, it is suggested that the best method to control it is to persuade people towards living in cities. I think this kind of implementation will have more cons than pros. This essay will discuss the drawbacks of it and provide other viable ways to control this malaise.
To begin with, cities are already overcrowded, so it is not practical to migrate rural dwellers to cities. If it is implemented, then it would not only enhance the population but also, gives birth to many threats such as inflation, crime and contaminate the environment. Overall, it will impair their quality of life and reduces life expectancy. To illustrate this further, it is surveyed by the economists that the crime rates and pollution in overpopulated cities has inclined to two times as compared to Less populated cities. Thus, its implications would result in loss for individuals and society as a whole. Furthermore, it brings inclination in unemployment in the cities, which directly impacts standard of living and growth of economy.
However, there are plethoras of ways through which problem of traffic can be controlled. The Authority should offer jobs and amenities to the natives where they live in like suburbs and the countryside. Hence, it would benefit in terms of earning, education, health, etceteras. In addition, Online jobs and e-commerce business can be promoted, so that people don’t feel the need of commuting. This will save their time, money and especially environment. Besides this, cities dwellers should also come forward as they can opt public vehicle rather than their own vehicle and go for the car pooling as well.
In conclusion, although cities provide many facilities and opportunities to people, but this cannot be denied that this migrating can leads to other dangers to large extent. Hence, government and masses should rely on other ways to eradicate it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
- why telivision has become the most preffered option in free time and how this activity has made the people lazy and lack in social interaction 89
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challanges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well. What problems will your country face in next ten years?How can these problems be overcome? 84
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 61
- You have borrowed something from your friend but it was damaged Write a letter to your friend and say Apologize for damaging the product How was it damaged What will you do about it 56
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21135646688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83630074159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2784401332 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133307261884 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387164829722 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338164202067 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795652998821 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144673827437 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21135646688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83630074159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2784401332 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133307261884 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387164829722 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338164202067 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795652998821 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144673827437 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.