In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last decades, it is common to see, in some countries, women being employed in the same full-time jobs as men. As a result, many believe that household chores must be divided to both the sexes. I completely agree with this statement for the reasons explained below.
Firstly, the weight of the combination of household works and a full-time job will be reduced for women. The traditional norm that prevailed in the past consisted of men being the only breadwinners in the houses. Women were occupied with the household chores and the raising of the kids. Nowadays, the status of women has changed radically, and they are financially supportive in the families too. Thus, it is unfeasible for women to combine a full-time job with the cleaning of the house, the ironing of clothes, the cooking and the children's nurturing. Men should be aware of cooking the dinner, and cleaning the home, in order to give their assistance to women.
Secondly, sharing the responsibilities of a house would have a positive psychological impact for women. Women will have the time to improve their professional skills, if men know how to make cuisines. Consequently, they will feel more satisfied that they can take part in the responsibilities of the head of a family, because of their wages. Also, women who communicate with their colleagues and enlarge their social status, they will become more self-confident. The latter attitude was completely absent in the past, and it was the reason for depressed women. according to a survey.
In conclusion, I agree with the contribution of household works in both women and men, because it will affect the women positively regarding their time management and their emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | Tamanna Champaneri | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Sprios_D | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | nigora@ | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | leminhthong098 | 89 | view |
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to cooperate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe it is better to raise children in the city while others consider the countryside to be a more suitable choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
... it was the reason for depressed women. according to a survey. In conclusion, I agree ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04225352113 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91064099228 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.19410462 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342524847865 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113761066051 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807504721081 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231051398112 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582772881743 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.