Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than the news presented by whose views are different from your own.
When it comes to watch news, whether is news presented by people who has similar views better or not? Although some believe this measure should stand as the priority choice, it is reading news written by people who get different point of views contribute the greatest benefits.
It is so argued that people should read newspaper which has similar position with you, because you may feel confident that their prediction is same to those celebrities who’s writing papers. The supporters of this argument must be reminded that sometimes those analysis made by certain media may be wrong. If people always gain information from particular side and invest a lot of money followed by those instruction, it’s highly possible to lose millions of dollars from it. By comparison, although people may feel upset about reading news which is completely different from them, they get the information from both sides. Hence, they can make the comparison, and increase the possibility of making the right investment, and then people may actually feel confident about it.
Supporters of watching news by people whose views are similar to your own may still argue that people will be happy about watching good news of their country and favorite politician. The real picture of it, however, is that sometimes the media they like may lie to their audiences, and people will not just angry about it but also even lose their life. In 2020, people in Wuhan strongly believed that the flu is controllable, and people believe that they won’t be infected by other due to the reports from official media. However, it turned out that that information was fake, and there were lots of people have been infected. Hence, lots of people got angry about why media conceal the truth. By contrast, If government and civilians believed the news from other media, and took immediate action to prevent the infection, the result may not be that severe, and thousands of people would not die.
So beneficial is reading news from different medias that it must be taken into more serious consideration. It is this choice that allows people to make precise comparison and can even save their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | ShayesteTR | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement Company should not allow their employees to using email during weekend 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity 73
- The government should offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this analysis' or 'those analyses'?
Suggestion: this analysis; those analyses
...rgument must be reminded that sometimes those analysis made by certain media may be wrong. If ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this instruction' or 'those instructions'?
Suggestion: this instruction; those instructions
...e and invest a lot of money followed by those instruction, it’s highly possible to lose millions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47833628227 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5131528711 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283735050166 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100479305656 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102177664034 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179804197844 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619396256417 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.