Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates what skeptics think about the impossible existence of bees from 200 million years ago. On the other hand, the lecture states that it is perfectly possible that bees have been on earth for such a long time.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that there are not fossils of bees that date from 200 million year ago, the earliest that have been found is 100 million years old. Nonetheless, the lecture maintains that even though it is truth what skeptics say it should be also understandable that it could have been impossible to preserve bees in those times and there were not many trees to survive.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points on that bees, in the past, might have not fed on the same type of plants they do in these times, they may have used not flowering plants like pine trees. These claims refute the writer’s implication that 200 million years ago flowering plants did not exist.
Ultimately, the article wraps its arguments by declaring that the nest structure is missing of caps with a spiral pattern that modern bees do in order to cover their nest. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by insisting that there is evidence that when the 200 million years old fossils were discovered they had the same chemical that bees in the actuality use to cover their nest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ame chemical that bees in the actuality use to cover their nest.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, nonetheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75518672199 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32618415617 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3096841751 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.25 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839644888691 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361940920927 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382494884458 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506892263157 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237883191187 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.