Cane frogs
In the set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that methods taken into consideration, in order to stop the immense growth of the cane frogs in Australia would be successful and provides
three examples to endorse his idea. On the other hand, the professor states that the measures suggested for eradication of cane frogs either would be unsuccessful or would damage the current scenario even more.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that using an already proven strategy for other rodents will be successful, as constructing a broad fence along the country will prevent the advancement of cane toads in the areas where their growth has not been seen yet. Nonetheless, the lecture maintains that building a national fence would not stop the propagation of frog species because
frogs use the water passages of streams and rivers for their spread and streamflow could not be controlled, hence there are chances the cane frog population will increase too.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points out that untrained volunteers would destroy the Native Australian frog species as they will be unable to distinguish between the two species, and thus they could harm the endangered species of frogs in Australia. These claims refute the writer's implication that the government should start a campaign to motivate the volunteers to help in the eradication of cane frogs and this collaboration would be fruitful for diminishing the harmful toads.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring that researchers are in the process to develop a virus which will be an asset in controlling the cane frog's spread as it will only kill the cane frogs and will not be harmful to most of the other species. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by insisting that it would have a terrible impact on the Natural habitat of cane frogs, as, when virus infected frogs were transported to the central and south America, their natural habitat, the virus would infect the remaining population of there and it results in severe ecological diturbances.
- Burning mirrors 80
- It s been thought that not all the knowledge gained from books is as important as knowledge gained through experience Compare the knowledge gained from books and those through experience Explain your opinion Use examples and reasons to support your opinio 73
- Life on Mars 80
- It is better for children to choose the job that is very similar to their parent than to choose a completely different job explain your answers with reasons 71
- T Rex bone tissue 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the propagation of frog species because frogs use the water passages of streams ...
^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...s in Australia. These claims refute the writers implication that the government should ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd south America, their natural habitat, the virus would infect the remaining pop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, nonetheless, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12316715543 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71035651822 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542521994135 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 21.2450331126 198% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3226954008 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 218.375 110.228320801 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.625 21.698381199 196% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409222412835 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208412583229 0.0996497079465 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863305017238 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24472847352 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649024878216 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 13.3589403974 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.498013245 179% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.