Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a saying that there will be fewer cars in use twenty years later. I do not agree with this prediction, and the reasons are in many aspects.
First of all, consider the growing population and public transport. The population on this planet has been increasing sharply since the 20th century. Some researchers predicted that there would be over 2.5 billion people living on the Earth in twenty years. Even though the public transport system is developing at high speed, to serve so many people will still be tough for it. Thus, people still have to rely on cars, their own cars. Also, with the economy growing, people will have more income, so more people will afford cars in twenty years. In this situation, how can the number of cars decrease?
In addition, cars which use electricity rather than fossil fuel, those designed by Tesla for instance, will be pervasive in the future. An explosion in the development of environment -friendly cars has taken place since 2010. There are already over 10 companies which are dedicated to designing and manufacturing this kind of cars in China, and the traditional car enterprises like BMW and Ford have launched their electric cars as well.
Electric cars nowadays are capable of running about 400 kilometers without recharging, and this will no doubt be improved with the advance in battery, making them as useful as the traditional cars. This category of cars does not produce greenhouse gas and just need electricity which can be produced using sunshine. So, the wide use of these cars will diminish the concern that cars are harmful to the environment. With such an advantage, purchasing these cars are and will be encouraged, and decreasing the number of cars is no longer required.
We can imagine that in twenty years, the infrastructure will be better and more widespread that it can benefit almost everyone, and the environment-friendly cars will replace most traditional cars, benefiting the whole ecosystem. The number of cars will not be a problem, and people will innovate more and more wonderful cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and the reasons are in many aspects. First of all, consider the growing popul...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., how can the number of cars decrease? In addition, cars which use electricity ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... launched their electric cars as well. Electric cars nowadays are capable of ru...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of cars is no longer required. We can imagine that in twenty years, the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, kind of, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01445086705 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71397132425 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540462427746 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9757039736 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3888888889 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284133210705 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103325413451 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890688796815 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202494851444 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117058086781 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.