What are the advantages and the disadvantages of being over-competitive to individuals and society?
Recently, the phenomenon of advantages and the disadvantages of being over-competitive to individuals and society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated
debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that impacts of being over-competitive to individuals can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, being over-competitive to individuals and society can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, advantages and the disadvantages of being over-competitive to individuals and society might increase the consequences of critical
needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively
with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of impacts of being over-competitive to society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-21 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-10 | Mohammad1364 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | Alireza.r.m | 70 | view |
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it isimportant for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- What are the advantages and the disadvantages of being over competitive to individuals and society 84
- The government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 100
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 84
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57882954808 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6123780638 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.454545455 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.12807881773 484% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428322065004 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160881452782 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176618656461 0.071462118173 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101564022048 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172214939224 0.0609392437508 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.