Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have
to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay
attention to this. What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to
save the environment?
The majority of experienced scientists have been warning citizens for many years that in order to preserve the environment, we have to limit the utilization of energy in our lifespan. However, lots of residents do not pay attention to this. This essay will look into the principal reasons for this, as well as the beneficial solutions to encourage people to protect the environment in the following paragraphs with smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one side, one of the most significant reasons for a lack of attention to the consumption of more energy is the opulent lifestyle of inhabitants. Mainly because a plethora of individuals wants to live better instead of living in an ordinary condition. For instance, it is an indisputable fact that industrialized countries consume more energy compared to the industrializing or destitute nations. The most incredible solution to this would be organizing a special group, which should be specialized to educate people and children to use less energy. As a result of this trend, everyone endeavors to limit the usage of more energy in the future.
On the other side, the next reason for ignoring the warnings of researchers is it has been becoming an instinct like drug abuse among the residents. That is because today, everybody used to use more energy, especially, youngsters. For example, if we back to the past, our ancestors prepared their lessons or read books without the light with the help of a candle a long time ago, however, nowadays, lots of parents created and provided their children with extremely comfortable conditions in spite of educating them. The subsequent beneficial solution would be understanding every child to protect the environment by consuming less energy from their childhood and understanding the repercussions of this reaction. As a consequence of this, they also explain these strategies and the expecting disasters of this phenomenon to the next generations.
In conclusion, a lucrative lifestyle, and instinct are the notable reasons for this issue, as well as educating youngsters and organizing the special group are the long-term and progressive solutions to preserve the energy.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion 84
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The diagrams below illustrate the early tools from 1 4 million years ago and 800 000 years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 100
- Water Usage Australia 71
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he subsequent beneficial solution would be understanding every child to protect the environment ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27507163324 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08187734944 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550143266476 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0214247463 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404370503142 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120979509252 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844806084822 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238837964841 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155070310413 0.056905535591 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.