The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the consumption of four different type of meat, fish,lamb,chicken and beef in a European country in the year 1997 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that beef is the most popular used meat and fish is very less popular used meat in European country in all year 1997 to 2004.
Firstly, in the year 1997 to 1989 beef is the highest useful meat in European country around 150-200 grams per week and the same year lamb and chicken are used approximately 100-150 grams per week. In the year 1997 and 1989 fish consumed in European country about 50 grams per week.
Secondly, after the year1989 chicken is most useful meat around 250 grams per week in European country and lamb and beef both are very less used after the year 1989 respectively (50-100) grams per week in European country. Fish is same used meat in all year under 50 grams per week in European country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | dhruvalpatel | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | dhruvalpatel | 69 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of industry sector s contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 67
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004 67
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have scar a television and a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in a European country between 1997 and 2004 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , lamb
...ion of four different type of meat, fish,lamb,chicken and beef in a European country ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rams per week. In the year 1997 and 1989 fish consumed in European country about ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37930530828 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 64.0 106.607317073 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2252067705 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269122920006 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199011883231 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118658466067 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237069505866 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12412702288 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.