You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Currently there is a contentious argument over creation of a law that makes it illegal to reject someone for a job based upon their age in some countries. Age of a person is a critical deciding factor for grabbing certain roles in the company. I this that this is a negative development to make it illegal to reject job applicant based on age. In this essay I will discuss why I think it to be a negative development.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rationale reasons that prove that rejecting an applicant based on his age is totally valid. Different jobs require different skills which are constantly changing with age be it looks, physical stamina, learning ability. For instance, the job of a weight trainer requires lifting heavy loads so it is rationale to reject a senior citizen for this role. A modeling career is rare after age of fifty. Moreover, certain jobs are meant for younger age group as such people are skilled with the latest advances in technology and can do technical work more professionally. For example, when Indian rural banks shifted to computer based data collection from document based it was the fresh graduates who were aware of latest technological developments and shouldered the responsibility well.
On the contrary, some people think that senior citizens are not preferred for any job because of job rejection based on age. I believe that this is not true because experiential learning is gained with age and there are certain roles on management and administrative level that requires senior citizens. For instance, Alibaba group chairman Jack Maa always quotes that twenties is the age of learning and post forty is the age group to employee young employees to work for you.
In conclusion, I believe that rejecting an employee based on his/her age is totally valid and the government of any country should not make these kinds of irrational laws that abolish the companies to select the suitable employees based on age along with other important criteria. Would the governments understand such issue before passing such laws? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- System for rubbish collection is not working in your area and causing problems to u and your neighbors Describe how rubbish collection is not working properly Explain how it is affecting you and your neighbors Suggest what should be done to solve this pro 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 746, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... was the fresh graduates who were aware of latest technological developments and shoulder...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9943019943 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75376722007 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532763532764 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3235738094 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296515240239 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101218918638 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745622326576 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189928172721 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779734199894 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.