TPO 41
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
It is a highly debated issue whether teachers were less appreciated and valued by society nowadays, which can be approached with different angles due to its complexity. Although some people think that it is false, it is my firm belief that this statement is true. I will describe and develop the reasons and explanations in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, teachers were appreciated by society in the past since professional knowledge is obtained at school and taught by teachers. However, there are various ways to learn by one's own today, and thus teachers were less appreciated by society. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Starting to prepare for entering college at a late time and teachers were already reviewing topics in senior year, I cannot follow the classes. I did not give up entering a great college, so I need to learn by myself about all these subjects. I found senior students notes on the internet and some books that are highly recommended, even made a strict schedule to follow. Benefit from the simple context in the reviewing books and the comprehensive notes, it is easy for me to understand and recall the knowledge I learned, and my grades on exams increase rapidly. Eventually, I got the highest grade in class on the college exam and got into an excellent college, without the help of teachers.
Besides, the value of jobs nowadays are mostly indicated by the amount of salaries. Since teachers' salaries did not grow much through the years and there are many high-paid jobs, teachers were also less valued by society present-day. For instance, while asking a child 'What is your dream job?' The answers mostly are doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, seldom of them will say teacher. This is because people always want more money, that is, having high salaries. Likewise, when they become parents, they will emphasize the weight of money to their children. Children who have such thoughts care about whether or not they can be wealthy in the future, and thus want to have jobs with high salaries. Apparently, becoming a teacher may not lead to the future they want, thus becoming less valued nowadays.
To sum up, with reasons mentioned above, I believe that teachers are less appreciated and valued by society these days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- TPO 38 Integrated 80
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 70
- TPO 43 Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting 73
- TPO 40 integrated 80
- TPO 39 Integrated 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ldren who have such thoughts care about whether or not they can be wealthy in the future, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, while, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95561357702 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63957175774 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566579634465 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2126042774 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252417171093 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663963170514 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625491173779 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155857154191 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220100486575 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.