In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food from other regions more than local food.
As a result, much of the food has to come from other regions.
Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages?
It is undeniable that food is the fundamental need for living beings; however, with globalisation and increased people travelling to different continents, curiosity to taste different food has surged. Nevertheless, people getting settled in foreign countries are keen to set up their local food joints in other countries. As a result, the unique ingredients required to make the dish have to be delivered from other regions, across the boundaries.
On the one hand, the increase in demand for a variety of food has upscalled the hotel inudstry and the import-export requirement. The technology is developed to reduce the item's perishability, such as fruits like mangoes; due to this, new opportunites are developed from a business point of view, thus increasing the employment and job opportunities. Furthermore, people who can not travel to other regions can taste different cultural and traditional food and share some health benefits. Like south Indian dish, idli and dosa, which are now cooked worldwide and considered healthy breakfast options. The Indian spices are in great demand globally for its authentic aroma and flavour; thus, local producers export extra to avoid waste.
On the other hand, the increase in demand on foreign lands relatively affects the local prices. To increase perishable food items life-expectancy, indisputably, the food items are injected with chemicals; which are not healthy as the organic fruits and vegetables. Apart from this, the foreign junk food joints like pizzas and burgers have undoubtedly given rise to obesity and other unhealthy problems to society. Moreover, the chemical-based compounds are used to taste the food as the original, but deteriorating the food's nutrients, like milk-powder instead of milk.
To sum up, the disadvantage of this trend outweighs the benefits of it. With the greed of making more money, human health is put in danger. The food that is not likely to be easily perishable must be made available to other regions, but injecting with harmful contents can cause a substantial problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | parabshreyas | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Oscar.K | 87 | view |
- Some think that climate change reforms will negatively affect business Others feel they are an opportunity for businesses Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- You work for an international company You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job Write a letter to your manager In your letter describe the training course you want to do explain what the company could do to hel 89
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what extent do you agree 78
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole Discuss this view and give your own opinion 75
- Write about the following topic Nowadays news companies spend a lot of money covering international news However local news is more relevant to people s lives and should receive more funding To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
...e technology is developed to reduce the items perishability, such as fruits like mang...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, apart from, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35384615385 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98394282668 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572307692308 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8686785802 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37616452968 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113301092233 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562369680493 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221520014201 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369855125581 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.