Colonization in asteroidsIn this set of materials, the author strongly postulates that the colonization of people in asteroids is a best option to survive as compared to Mars and provides three reasons to endorse it's idea. However, the professor states that the colonization on asteroids is not practical and gainsay each of the arguments mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that asteroids are much smaller as compared to the other planets so the gravity on asteroids will be low which will ease landing and taking off of spaceships relatively. In contrast, the speaker explains the risk associated with low gravity. Decreased gravitational pull not only helps in landing and taking off but also causes health problems in people. The astronaut who spent a few months in space in low gravity premises suffered issues with loss of muscle mass and bone density. By taking in view this dangerous risk, this rationale is not validated in order to survive on asteroids.
Next, the professor further points out in detail that precious metals obtained from mining in asteroids will not be profitable for long term because of two objectives. Firstly, the cost of supporting life on an asteroid and transporting equipment through spaceships will be very high. Secondly, asteroids are rich in valuables. Since, the market will be super saturated by them, they will lose their worth after a while. These points refute the implication of the author about getting valuable metals from asteroids is enriching. As the writer states that the mining minerals can prove very beneficial for business if people started living in asteroids.
Finally, the article wraps it's arguments by declaring that the asteroid orbits very close to earth as compared to Mars and even the moon. Therefore, it will be easy and affordable for people to set foot on asteroids. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this reason by showing the inaccuracy of the author that although it will be easy to travel to closer orbits but orbits move away often so coming back to Earth is not certain at all. In fact, travelling to and fro from Mars is relatively undeniable.
In this set of materials, the author strongly postulates that the colonization of people in asteroids is a best option to survive as compared to Mars and provides three reasons to endorse it's idea. However, the professor states that the colonization on asteroids is not practical and gainsay each of the arguments mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that asteroids are much smaller as compared to the other planets so the gravity on asteroids will be low which will ease landing and taking off of spaceships relatively. In contrast, the speaker explains the risk associated with low gravity. Decreased gravitational pull not only helps in landing and taking off but also causes health problems in people. The astronaut who spent a few months in space in low gravity premises suffered issues with loss of muscle mass and bone density. By taking in view this dangerous risk, this rationale is not validated in order to survive on asteroids.
Next, the professor further points out in detail that precious metals obtained from mining in asteroids will not be profitable for long term because of two objectives. Firstly, the cost of supporting life on an asteroid and transporting equipment through spaceships will be very high. Secondly, asteroids are rich in valuables. Since, the market will be super saturated by them, they will lose their worth after a while. These points refute the implication of the author about getting valuable metals from asteroids is enriching. As the writer states that the mining minerals can prove very beneficial for business if people started living in asteroids.
Finally, the article wraps it's arguments by declaring that the asteroid orbits very close to earth as compared to Mars and even the moon. Therefore, it will be easy and affordable for people to set foot on asteroids. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this reason by showing the inaccuracy of the author that although it will be easy to travel to closer orbits but orbits move away often so coming back to Earth is not certain at all. In fact, travelling to and fro from Mars is relatively undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | Safa Arshad | 66 | view |
- Spending money 73
- Model of a painting 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Why city should build an indoor park 73
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... colonization of people in asteroids is a best option to survive as compared to M...
^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...serting that asteroids are much smaller as compared to the other planets so the gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 30.3222958057 195% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01396648045 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65989410913 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54469273743 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5015673469 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.588235294 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294574415176 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912715478226 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165162539957 0.0662205650399 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232806623828 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255660143791 0.0443174109184 577% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.