The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar graph gives facts and figures about the outcome of the survey among five different Australian metropolises namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart on their purchasing and drinking habits of two categories: coffee and tea. It is perspicuous a fact that the upshot is shown in percentage of city-dwellers.
In general, a glance at the given chart reveals that Melbourne held the most gigantic statistic in the number of people going to a cafe dates back to 4 weeks ago. Be that as it may, it can be easily recognized that the ratio of fresh coffee bought in Brisbane was by far the lowest, at the same time the instant coffee purchased in Sydney shared the same trend.
First and foremost, one particularly interesting fact highlighted by the figure is that the disproportion between three kinds of habits was clear cut. For instance, in Sydney, it is an indisputable thing to say that the percentage of cafe goers was considerably high, which worked out to approximately 61% while the ratio of both fresh and instant coffee bought was only in the vicinity of 43% and 45%. What is more, as it can be seen in Adelaide, the percentage of residents opting for fresh and instant coffee may somehow nearly the same, with minor variation up to 1%.
On the flip side, looking at other features in the graph, the proportion of Melbourne citizens going to a cafe reached the peak at around 63%. In addition, it stands to reason that the buying habits of Hobart’s city-dwellers was a lot more higher than any other four urban area given, which was made up of 54%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...its of Hobart’s city-dwellers was a lot more higher than any other four urban area given, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in general, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70883435335 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4413232473 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133126328076 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516732842126 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486770923266 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841411818328 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558137647422 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.